REVIEWS: Cathedral – Story

I realize that the whole story has really been told in these first two paragraphs–all but the resolution.  The following twelve pages simply expand the narrative to the ultimate conclusion: how he is changed to overcome his prejudice and resentment.

Posted in REVIEWS | Comments Off on REVIEWS: Cathedral – Story

REVIEWS: Cathedral – Character & Showing

What seems to be the main problem the narrator has with his wife’s blind friend is not his blindness–though that is the focus of the change brought about in the empathy of the narrator–but rather his feelings of being an outsider.  He is her second husband.  She has shared her past with him and yet he does not want it, would likely prefer not to have known about the men in her life prior to him and would definitely prefer she sever her ties with Robert.  This self-centeredness brought about by feelings of exclusion (after all, all three of them knew each other in the time before the narrator came into her life) causes him to overemphasize their flaws–even his own wife’s, i.e., putting down her poetry.  As a matter of fact, this comes into play:

She told me he touched his finger to every part of her face, her nose–even her neck!  She never forgot it.  She even tried to write a poem about it. 

Just by the language Carver uses, he tells us what’s going on without coming out and saying it–this is extremely skilled particularly when it’s coming from the first person narrator and we’re learning more about him that he’s admitting to us:  "every part of her face, her nose–even her neck!"   These are parts of her physical being that he feels only he has a right to touch.  "She never forgot it."  There, this blind man has captured a portion of her mental space as well.  And the clincher:  "She even tried to write a poem about it."  The coupe de grace–a part of her emotional self.

What he doesn’t mention is if she ever wrote a poem about or to him.  This question becomes extremely painful when you realize he says:

She was always trying to write a poem.  She wrote a poem or two every year, usually after something really important had happened to her.

He’s disdainful of her poetry; likely because indeed, she had never written one for him.

Posted in REVIEWS | Comments Off on REVIEWS: Cathedral – Character & Showing

REALITY?: More craziness with tax dollars

Because of a decrease in requested budget funds, one elementary school in Shelton CT is no longer willing to make their facilities available after a certain hour, around 4 pm, to save on utilities and payroll.  This means that the local Girl Scout troop can no longer meet there. 

I love the Girl Scouts and all they stand for; I hate their cookies.  But do I feel obligated to have town tax money go towards this private organization?  No.  I’m not from Shelton but these things tend to run the round and if little Elise thinks it’s unfair to her and her troop, why does she feel it’s fair for the town property owners to pay all costs incurred to enable her to meet there? 

I think that use of the school facilities is a privilege and a good thing to offer to such groups.  However, when cuts must be made, here’s one are where it unfortunately makes the most sense rather than slashing back on legitimate school programs, textbooks, computers, teachers, or security.

Posted in REALITY | Comments Off on REALITY?: More craziness with tax dollars

LITERATURE: And Big Government

It was only a matter of time until Connecticut realized that despite its 6% sales tax it was still losing some of it to the internet shopping style so many of us enjoy.

But Connecticut is a genius with making itself money:  Tax deliveries!

Now at the time of high gas prices, they’re honestly going to add to that burden with a delivery tax?

Now that’s Yankee ingenuity. And here’s some more: I’m getting my Amazon list together and will likely order all in one big delivery before the tax is put into effect.

Posted in LITERATURE | Comments Off on LITERATURE: And Big Government

REVIEWS: Cathedral by Raymond Carver

Basically a story of human nature in resentment and jealousy, feelings of being an outsider, and how they are overcome and changed by face to face confrontation.

In this first person pov, a man gives us a setup of what is going on, in a very neutral reporting-style voice for the first half of the first paragraph.  The choice of words is as important as the voice and narrative structure which is made up of short, to the point statements:

This blind man, an old friend of my wife’s, he was on his way to spend the night.  His wife had died.  So he was visiting the dead wife’s relatives in Connecticut.  He called my wife from his in-law’s.  Arrangements were made.

The narrator seems almost as if he is holding back on details for fear of revealing his feelings.  There is much told by the reference to the man as "This blind man" rather Robert so and so, or even structuring the opening as "An old friend of my wife’s, a blind man…" which would in fact be less telling of his feelings than what he says.  His wording is one of clipped and obvious holding back.  His feelings do come out in the second half of this paragraph quite clearly:

I wasn’t enthusiastic about his visit.  He was no one I knew.  And his being blind bothered me.  (…)A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to.

Even his admission of his feelings is succinct, and yet speaks volumes.  He "wasn’t enthusiastic" is how he starts it off, but the fact immediately come through that the reason is that the man is "no one (he) knew." This indicates a separation between his wife and himself in that the man is from her life, not his.  This is what he ranks first as his objection to the visit.  His next statement may seem flagrantly biased against the handicapped–which he has a right to be if he so wishes–yet there’s no sense of gentility about his language.  There almost appears to be an unconscious dig: "not something I looked forward to."

This will become more and more obvious as the story goes on, but the narrator refers to Robert as "the" or "this blind man", and his wife is always referred to in that way–as if to establish ownership.  There is a point he makes later on about names–and I’ll get to that.

Posted in REVIEWS | Comments Off on REVIEWS: Cathedral by Raymond Carver

LITERATURE: The Borderline of Author/Story

Excellent points being made by Dan Green over at The Reading Experience on separation of a writer from his work. In his post, A Nicer Chap, Dan comments on Yasmin Alibhai-Brown’s decision not to read anymore of this author’s books after reading a biography of V.S. Naipaul.

I’ve noticed that many folks are more accepting of a story after reading a bio of the writer, in that typical "oh, that’s why…" train of thought.  As if to understand Plath’s poetry you must understand Sylvia Plath herself.  It certainly can answer some questions, but is it what the poet expected us to find in her poetry?

I stay away from forewards and all that stuff until after I’ve read a book.  I may not even read it then unless I’m so intrigued by the concept of the story–more likely, stories–I’ve read. 

Posted in LITERATURE | Comments Off on LITERATURE: The Borderline of Author/Story

WRITING: Mood

Not.

Just, not.

Posted in WRITING | Comments Off on WRITING: Mood

REALITY?: Sauerkraut Soup

It’s something I haven’t made in a long, long time.  It was a favorite of mine that my mother made.  Boil pork ribs until tender, to the water add a can of cut (with scissors) sauerkraut and a can of Habitant Pea Soup.  Cut the pork off the bones into chunks and add back into the soup, add salt to both offset and enhance the sour taste and plenty of freshly ground pepper.

One thing I couldn’t find is the Habitant soup–I used Progresso instead and it looks sort of the same. I also forgot to throw in a couple bay leaves, and could have started it all with a can of beer which is what forms the basest base of all my soups. 

Obviously you need to like the flavor of sauerkraut and both of us do.  Though in one of my best chocolate cake recipes I use a can of sauerkraut and you don’t taste it at all.

Brave enough to try it?

Posted in REALITY | Comments Off on REALITY?: Sauerkraut Soup

LITERATURE: Perfect Example & Tropic of Cancer

We naturally recall other readings when we come across something similar, and one would think that these two books are just about opposites but then, there’s much that’s relative to both.

In Perfect Example, John Porcellino portrays his own adolescence in a short graphic novel that focuses on his  difficulty in understanding the transition from child to adult.  Miller’s Tropic of Cancer’s narrator is older, but does as well have many of the same questions about life as Porcellino’s character.  What’s interesting, is the way each puts into words–and in Porcellino’s case, graphic images–their wonderings and insights.

Here’s some from Miller:

In that sort of half-reverie which permits one to participate in an event and yet remain quite aloof, the little detail which was lacking began obscurely but insistently to coagulate, to assume a freakish, crystalline form, like the frost which gathers on the windowpane.  And like those frost patterns which seem to bizarre, so utterly free and fantastic in design, but which are nevertheless determined by the most rigid laws, so this sensation which commenced to take form inside me seemed also to be giving obedience to ineluctable laws.  My whole being was responding to the dictates of an ambiance which it had never before experienced; that which I could call myself seemed to be contracting, condensing, shrinking from the stale, customary boundaries of the flesh whose perimeter knew only the modulations of the nerve ends. (p. 95)

And here’s Porcellino:

And somehow we ended up at the place where he worked.  So I went inside.  I was wandering back and forth–the faces of people and things around me; there were lights–but I didn’t see them.  Sounds–but I didn’t hear them.   Because I saw then that life is like a dream.  (The Fourth of July)

Porcellino’s words are enhanced by images:  The faces of the people are disembodied, in many panels, John is tiny in comparison to the expanse of world around him.  In this particular scene, John floats alone towards a star, the people gone from his world.  In the final panel, even John does not exist in a world where a crescent moon and single star float about the ocean waves.

Miller’s character feels he sees everything with crystal clarity, in contrast to John’s image of life as a dream:

And the more substantial, the more solid the core of me became, the more delicate and extravagant appeared the close, palpable reality out of which I was being squeezed.  In the measure that I became more and more metallic, in the same measure the scene before my eyes became inflated.  The state of tension was so finely drawn now that the introduction of a single foreign particle, even a microscopic particle, as I say, would have shattered everything.

Miller’s character is a writer, therefore with more of a tendency to provide the imagery that Porcellino creates with his drawings, thus allowing the text to be of a simpler and yet no less dramatic form.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Perfect Example & Tropic of Cancer

WRITING: Story

It was on the twenty-seventh day that trouble started.  Jerome was cold and hungry, weak.  Tom and he had talked the days and food away and there was nothing new to say.  The silence put the thought into their heads.  There was no longer hope of rescue and one would likely end up eating the other.

The tundra spread out miles in all directions stark and flat.  At sunset, the flat horizon lumped around the twisted silhouette of Tom’s twin-engine Cessna. Barely shelter from the northern winds that found only that to howl around, the plane had settled into charred black sculpture telling stories to the men in their dreams at night.

Posted in WRITING | Comments Off on WRITING: Story

WRITING: Transfer of Information

Interesting concept: the output of the creative mind can get misinterpreted, misspelled and change in meaning

In yet another going-over of A Bottle of Beer, this sentence was questioned:

As Yolanda dozed, half in the world of the sun and the living, half in the world of the missed and the dead, the black spot of life on the highway advanced and grew into a man. (Inch by Inch)

The comparison–if one is indeed needed–of the two halves do not match. That is, sun and the living versus missed and the dead.

There’s no rule that says the two have to be accurate  opposites, and yet it  seems to be expected here.  The phrase itself came out  without  question or doubt, but it has stopped me in a few readings, however unsuccessfully.  When Jim brought it up once again, I decided to do something about it.  But what?

The first thought: sun and the living/dark and the dead.  Clear, simple, obvious.  Too obvious, I suspect.  What then was I thinking?  There are some connections that can be made here: The ‘missed’ being the entire evening’s focus of Yolanda’s attention, as well as being ‘dead.’  Or, I could have been using a subtle word for dark via ‘mist’ rather than ‘missed’ — sun and the living/mist and the dead.  Here too I wonder if I was aware of the homonym.

So I’m not sure what change will be made.  Gotta think on it a while.  It’s only one word and shouldn’t matter…but it does.

Posted in WRITING | Comments Off on WRITING: Transfer of Information

REALITY? & WRITING: Thought Rain

Wasting water in a morning shower singing Polish Christmas carols and eyes closed watching colors, shapes transform themselves from lips to eyes and back again and green to blue and black.  Is blue a guilty color?

Couldn’t find the eyelid wallpaper I’m used to; shut your eyes real tight and what comes back through all the years as if invention weren’t invented?  Mine is beige with brown geometric forms. Tiled, repeated; small pattern of the whole.

Feel torn like an old t-shirt into something connected by threads around the holes.

Wondering if the seeming lack of empathy was born out of religion or was comforted by it to think that all will balance in the end, all is fair.  But there must be an ever after for that to be.

And then reality begins again and there’s not time to wonder anymore.

Posted in REALITY, WRITING | 4 Comments

LITERATURE: Tropic of Cancer – Psychological Realism

There are reasons I’m forcing myself to read this, just as I had with Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.  Admittedly, I go a few pages at a time with days in between pages.  It’s tough reading and not particularly engrossing as far as character or story, but there are some wondrous passages hidden within the lazy ease of a young writer with too much free time and not enough ambition who seeks out the inner forces beneath the grimy crust of his friends. 

Still in the concert scene, the narrator is moved by the experience–both the music and the intermission–to closely observe the audience with a heightened awareness that appears to draw forth his creative nature making things not as they may be:

My thoughts are spreading. The music is slipping away from me, now that the drums have ceased. People everywhere are composed to order. Under the exit light is a Werther sunk in despair; he is leaning on his two elbows,his eyes are glazed. Near the door, huddled in a big cape, stands a Spaniard with a sombrero in his hand.  He looks as if he were posing for the "Balzac" of Rodin. From the neck up he suggests Buffalo Bill. In the gallery opposite me, in the front row, sits a woman with her legs spread wide apart; she looks as though she had lockjaw, with her neck thrown back and dislocated. The woman with the red hat who is dozing over the rail–marvelous if she were to have a hemorrhage! If suddenly she spilled a bucketful on those stiff shirts below. Imagine these bloody no-accounts going home from the concert with blood on their dickies!  (p. 77)

Fired up by the Spanish number, does he truly see a man with a cape and sombrero?  We get this image, but we are then told he reminds the narrator of Balzac and Buffalo Bill.  What we’re getting here is the excitement of spirit riled up by live perfomance.  I get that way at a Willie concert.  The narrator’s imagination carries the present into possible scenarios (I go there too, watching Willie).  They are extremes, so in this episode, he has been sufficiently excited to project his thoughts onto the real members of the audience (I tend to shut out the audience, the stage crew, the other band members…).

This isn’t just an invitation to trip along with the narrator.  It tells us as much about him as about what he is thinking.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Tropic of Cancer – Psychological Realism

WRITING: Character Quirks

One of the funny comments Jim Murphy made about Yolanda was that she was the type he could see would open the beer bottle with her teeth.  He’d seen it done.  It hurt my teeth to even think of it.

Tonight on Survivor, the winning tribe was rewarded with pizza and beer.  James opened the bottle with his teeth! 

It’s been a series of coincidences in my life lately.  Things I wonder, things I see, no more than a day or two apart.  Good things, bad things; as if I need immediate confirmation of what I may write because time is shorter with no fourscore and twenty to leisurely await the experience.

Posted in WRITING | Comments Off on WRITING: Character Quirks

CLASS NOTES: 4/2/08

Some pre-class notes first:  Sat down with Jim Murphy and we exchanged critiques.  I was in ninja costume so my notes to him were mostly of the cut and slash style.  I love Jim’s narrative voice.  It’s like settling down to storyhour.  Unfortunately, a lot of the intricate details he provides do tend to slow down the reading just when it should be getting towards the climax and this is where I did a lot of commenting (thanks to iPages!).  Jim’s imagery is terrific so I of course left that alone.  His dialogue as well is just real and in character and here is where he does a lot of pacing of narrative so beautifully. 

Jim went through the hypertext A Bottle of Beer again in its sleek new version and he caught some rough points that I either didn’t realize, or that I was too lazy to fix.  He was more than complimentary and I gave full permission to steal a couple of instances of imagery–though with Jim’s creative output, he sure won’t need them.  I do love getting Jim’s critique notes–he puts in some comments that just make me laugh out loud–and that’s his intent.  One thing that he brought up that was very interesting to me was his own opinion of who the runner represented–past lovers moving through her life.  This would make sense as it parallels her own reflections of the hour.  I still think it’s the devil though…

In class we did an exercise on writing a scenario with a main character and some action, then pulling out specific words or themes that are relative to the character.  How one would describe himself or his tendencies using specific words, then defining those words.

I won’t bother putting down here what I’d written in class–the character really didn’t help me by developing at all and it’s likely the worst trash I’ve ever written.  I do admire the other students who to a  one  delivered  well  rounded characters in the first few paragraphs of story.  It was proven helpful to go over the words they had chosen as defining the viewpoint of their character and to establish from there the most likely path the character would take through his adventure.

The last portion of class was devoted to Porcellino’s Perfect Example, and we learned how to apply the "word selection and definition" to this character.  ‘Size’ is an excellent word, as it implies how the character sees himself in comparison to his world.  ‘Invisibility’ is another choice that would give us an idea of how he relates to the world, and how he feels within it.  ‘Intimacy’ represents his reluctance or lack of ability to form a closeness with others–which seems to fit in well with the previous two word selections. 

We were reminded to read Raymond Carver’s Cathedral for next week.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CLASS NOTES: 4/2/08