REALITY?: Reincarnation

A strong believer, I; at least I used to be.  And still, my soul comes back to life here on earth playing in the dirt.  The vegie and cut-flower garden is almost completely planted.  Then onto flower pots and flower gardens long left unattended because I thought the soul had died.

Posted in REALITY | Comments Off on REALITY?: Reincarnation

LITERATURE: Rabbit, Run – Metaphor & New Media

Backtracking here for a moment because this stuck in my mind.  Updike sets us up with a wonderful metaphor as Rabbit looks into his past, but the setting is wonderfully done; Rabbit goes to his mother’s house to pick up his young son:

He walks back as far as the lit kichen window and steps onto the cement without the sole of his shoe scraping and on tiptoe looks in one bright corner.  He sees himself sitting in a high chair, and a quick odd jealousy comes and passes.  It is his son.  (p. 25)

While it may seem cliche to look into the window of his childhood home and momentarily see himself, the window frame acts as a module within the story as well as one within the image of the house and the neighborhood.  I could well imagine seeing this on a computer screen, clicking on the window to zoom in on the film clip of life that’s going on separately from the house exterior, and the man who stands there looking in.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Rabbit, Run – Metaphor & New Media

REALITY?: Planting Time

My wonderfully sunny and new disposition has been ever so slightly marred by the gossamerest wisp of cloud:  Still no jalapeno pepper plants to be found!

Now I’m certainly not going to be one who allows such a minor trifle to ruffle me; won’t even toss such an ort on the pile of things that truly would ruffle me–a whole lot, like a #8 tornado wind force–if I were perchance any longer the type of person who falls victim to such worry.  And allowed things to ruffle.

Talked with my oldest sister down in Florida yesterday.  She called to report what she’s heard that I already had.  She’s the one who gets the most upset and anxious, yet she was unusually calm and serene. It certainly put things in perspective and we moved on to a friendly chat on the weather.  Just prior to ending the call, I did remember to ask her to e-mail me the name of whatever she’s on, and the dosage.

Posted in REALITY | Comments Off on REALITY?: Planting Time

NEW MEDIA: Aaaaaahhh.

This is a bit more like it, though not the true me.  I tried but grew frustrated and gave up making black crepe drapes in Photoshop.

Posted in NEW MEDIA | Comments Off on NEW MEDIA: Aaaaaahhh.

NEW MEDIA: In Living Color

I can’t live this pink life much longer but in changing the look here, I decided I may as well strike up a new theme instead of just going back to the prior arrangement.

However, one more thought occurred to me:  While we’ve come to believe that our weblogs bespeak of our character (remember, Updike and imagery), things are changing–as they will be in constant motion in new media methods.

Folks don’t come around a site itself very often; I know I don’t actually "step onto the premises." I read in an RSS reader.  It’s very seldom that I click on the site unless they haven’t allowed me to read the entire post, or I choose to make a comment–and that I do a lot more often, as often as I can to support their efforts and show that support.

It opens up a whole new question about how the web is changing in that while weblogging opened up the world to new friends and communication, the feeds are closing that down again to revert back to a sit-and-read-the-newspaper-in-peace lifestyle. Interesting.

However, for the few who do come to the actual site, I’m going to change back to a more realistic image of what I produce and choose to present.

God knows, it’s not pink.

Posted in NEW MEDIA | 2 Comments

REALITY?: Huh?

How could everybody not carry jalapeno pepper plants for sale the weekend of Memorial Day?

Posted in REALITY | Comments Off on REALITY?: Huh?

LITERATURE: Rabbit, Run – Imagery

Updike appears to depend heavily on imagery to set both tone of setting and character:

Growing sleepy, Rabbit stops before midnight at a roadside cafe for coffee.  Somehow, though he can’t put his finger on the difference, he is unlike the other customers.  They sense it too, and look at him with hard eyes, eyes like little metal studs pinned into the white faces of young men sitting in zippered jackets in booths three to a girl, the girls with orange hair hanging like seaweed or loosely bound with gold barrettes like pirate treasure.  At the counter, middle-aged couples in overcoats bunch their faces forward into straws of gray ice-cream sodas. p. 36)

While some readers may find this an overdose, I love the color and movement the words evoke.  The place, the people, all telling of who and what they are and what makes them foreign to Rabbit.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Rabbit, Run – Imagery

WRITING: From Reality

In learning character development, we watch others to see how different they react from perhaps what we ourselves may do in any given situation.  I’m very  into trying to understand these differences right now, and find that natural instinct and learning is tempered by perception to a large measure.

I watched as a young robin hopped around the back lawn, stopped, poked into the earth, and pulled out a worm.  Immediately another robin (by his color, another young one, perhaps a brother or sister?) swooped down at the first and tried to take the prize.  They fought, flyed, chased for another fifteen minutes.

Both robins likely learned by watching Mom.  One learned to do as she did; the other learned to watch and retrieve as she tried to teach them the method and yet feed them.  It was surprising to watch, to ponder the way instincts and learning shape lives.

Posted in WRITING | Comments Off on WRITING: From Reality

WRITING: Know Thyself

I’m sitting here watching So You Think You Can Dance?  I try to watch the auditions on these talent reality shows and while I certainly know that some folk go on just for giggles, some seriously think they’ve got talent and are so very, very wrong.  There’s a real wacko on right now who honestly believes he’s good, and admits his motto is "I’m the best."  He’s very bad.  He does, however, represent a whole misguided generation led to believe that everybody can do anything, and that there is no good or bad, no right or wrong. He’s being told by Nigel that he’ll never be a dancer and "Sex" disagrees, insisting he’s good and believes in himself.  Nigel tells him that it is rude to think that he’s in the same class as some of the talent that’s there.  Now Sex’s mom is telling Nigel that if you have a dream, you can do whatever you want.  Nigel is trying to tell her that she’s doing her son a great disservice by allowing him to continue on this hopeless path.

This is something that comes up in writing quite often.  Everybody’s a writer, everybody’s a poet.  The out is that they can–if we forget the politically correct for a moment–be a good or a bad writer or poet, but mainly it’s a subjective call.  And a lot of people would wince when even that’s said.

Why is it then that watching passionate, confident, dedicated men and women dance or sing, we can still tell just as well as the judges (them’s that know) who’s good and who’s just plain untalented, will not make it despite training and never will reach their dream?

With the dedicated mental and emotional input required of writers, wouldn’t it be a kindness to be honest and save them hours, years of trudging in the wrong direction?

Posted in WRITING | Comments Off on WRITING: Know Thyself

BLOGGING: Happy Theme!

Now isn’t this so much more cheerful?

(Some of you may not see it, those who do may wish they didn’t.)

Posted in BLOGGING | 2 Comments

LITERATURE: Rabbit, Run – Character

Updike uses an omniscient third person point of view which naturally gives us good insight into a character.  As a matter of fact, everything seems to be about character here, and I like that.  It appears that this will be what drives the story and there’s already enough to see that troubles and conflicts will arise to produce a story just out of the information we have so far:

He goes to the closet and takes out the coat he hung up so neatly.  The clutter behind him in the room–the Old-fashioned glass with its corrupt dregs, the choked ashtray balanced on the easy-chair arm, the rumpled rug, the floppy stacks of slippery newspapers, the kid’s toys here and there broken and stuck and jammed, a leg off a doll and a piece of bent cardboard that went with some breakfast-box cutout, the rolls of fuzz under the radiators, the continual crisscrossing mess–clings to his back like a tightening net.  (p. 19)

So we’re not only given what Rabbit’s wife, Janice, is like, but how he looks at his world.  How he sees her, his "kid", his home, all becoming a "tightening net."  We can feel that Rabbit has thoughts of running.

And Janice:

She moves into the kitchen, angry but not angry enough.  She should be really sore, or not sore at all, since all he had said was what he had done a couple hundred times.  Maybe a thousand times.  Say, on the average once every three days since 1956.  What’s that? Three hundred.  That often?  Then why is it always an effort?  She used to make it easier before they got married.  She could be sudden then.  Just a girl.  (p. 17)

How typical of a relationship; the different point of views, the difference in priorities, the hostility held in and argued within oneself instead of with each other.  Janice obviously has an image of herself that doesn’t jive with Rabbit’s version.  She knows that she’s changed and yet the journey as she sees it is a path marked with street names unknown to Rabbit, as his are to her.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Rabbit, Run – Character

LITERATURE: Rabbit, Run – Writing Style

Um.  Don’t think I’ve ever read Updike before and I’m finding him quite likeable in his language use and style.

The frame houses climb the hill like a single staircase.  The space of six feet or so that each double house rises above its neighbor contains two wan windows, wide-spaced like the eyes of an animal, and is covered with composition shingling varying in color from bruise to dung.  The fronts are scabby clapboards, once white.  There are a dozen three-story homes, and each has two doors.  The seventh door is his.  The wood steps up to it are worn; under them there is a cubbyhole of dirt where a lost toy molders.  A plastic clown.  He’s seen it there all winter but he always thought some kid would be coming back for it.  (p. 12)

The similes used are amazingly precise: the houses like a staircase, the windows like the eyes of an animal.  The description of color, "from bruise to dung," goes along with the shabbiness Updike paints the neighborhood.  Worn steps, a cubbyhole of dirt, a lost toy–the incongruity of a plastic clown.  This scene has been decaying for years prior to Rabbit living here, yet he continues the neglect by noticing but not touching the toy.  He’s also one of many; the seventh door amid twenty-four.  No one, it would seem, has it better or worse than their neighbors.  All are ensconced here in a life of gradual decay.

Tells us an awful lot about Rabbit, and the way his story may unfold if we leave him to live it.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Rabbit, Run – Writing Style

BLOGGING: Announcement

Though these issues tend to be recurring, enough to bring to mind a "cry wolf" effect, there was a very real crisis here that resulted in the wiping out of three out of four weblogs and Spinning was honestly this (.) close to annihilation itself. However, for better or worse, an obsessive nature and no hours wasted in sleep have managed to bring forth a quick resolution.

There was a definite need for some long overdue changes here at Spinning and to prevent restructuring or complete demolition, some heads had to roll. Therefore, a decision has been announced that Spinning will continue. Susan, however, has been canned.

Our new head writer and editor, oddly enough also named Susan, is a capable, mature, confident woman who remains untouched by mundane problems of the world. Should a cloud happen to drift overhead, she has the breath power of the Big Bad Wolf to huff and puff and blow it clean away out to sea, where, by the way, she is able to swim among sharks while playfully poking them into a friendly game of chase. Though bright and beautiful—as are we all naturally in the everybody is a star tradition—the merest hint of wrinkles have formed from a constant smile rather than aggravation or worry of which she knows none, or at least, refuses to acknowledge as such. In keeping with this more uplifting personage, you will see no whining, complaining, or off-the-cuff ranting here. Problems?  We don’t need no stinkin’ problems. Susan calls these minor annoyances, in her perfectly perky way, “Trouble Bubbles” and on her, they bead up and roll off like raindrops on a blue plastic tarp.

Every word from her mouth is a self-assured pearl of wisdom. Literature commentary will be bolstered by adhering a bit more strictly to some method of literary critique, albeit in a personalized approach. Reality, if noted at all, will be of the parade and balloons, blue skies and rainbows variety. She knows that every cloud can be ripped open and left bleeding to reveal a silver lining. This prevents wasting time fretting about the rightness or wrongness of her life, since a cloud can be plucked from the sky and disemboweled with alarmingly swift dexterity. Susan is also a new media advocate and understudy—about the only thing she has in common with her predecessor—and has the bodacious ability to overlook her shortcomings and replace the it sucks. I’m useless attitude with an it’s wonderful but it could be wonderfuller way of thinking. She knows no self-doubt, no sullenness of mood, no passion of fury. Thus, she has no need for introspective postings, being well-adjusted and aware that a peek inside the soul would only reveal—you got it—a bloody silver lining. And oh yes, she is a natural blonde.

The most evident change will be visual: A new logo, color scheme and arrangement will be the first order of business on Susan’s laptop projects. As soon as she stops grinning while plaiting dandelions into necklaces of dreams long enough to lower her glance to the screen, her inspired fingers to the keyboard.

After that, her cheerful disposition and bulldog tenacity of spirit will be directed towards finding and rebuilding from thousands of smashed tiny scraps the ill-fated weblog once known as Hypercompendia.

Posted in BLOGGING | Comments Off on BLOGGING: Announcement

LITERATURE: Up Next: John Updike’s Rabbit, Run

Rabbit, Run

What can I say?  I haven’t read it yet.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Up Next: John Updike’s Rabbit, Run

LITERATURE: The Shadow of the Wind – Finale

The best line in the novel:

Julian had once told me that a story is a letter the author writes to himself, to tell himself things that he would be unable to discover otherwise.  (p. 363)

While the novel was fast paced, interesting, complex, and loaded with characters, intrigue and conflicts to propel the mystery along, I would not be prone to call this novel either a masterpiece or a destined-to-be classic, thus disagreeing with The Daily Telegraph’s front and back cover blurbs.

The main character, Daniel, is a bit of a crybaby and a manipulator, a mirror of the subject of his search, the mysterious author, Julian Carax.  Other characters do stand out, in particular, his friend Fermin.  But without sympathy for the two main characters, it’s hard to accept a lot of their actions.

One of my biggest problems with this novel is the question of whether this novel is carefully plotted or merely overly contrived.  There are just too many coincidences between Daniel and Julian, in personality and events.  Carlos Ruiz Zafon winds two pretty complicated stories here, but he ties them together by making them almost unbelievably similar separated only by time.  Daniel not only looks like Julian, impregnates his first lover, a seventeen year-old girl just as did Julian, and more, but they even are presented with the same "Victor Hugo wrote with it" fountain pen as some point early in their writing careers. 

There was another problem of Zafon foreshadowing beautifully, then overdoing the hints and finally presenting the obvious like it was a big surprise or something.  With several references to the fact that the hatter who raises Julian may not be his real father, and the many related adventures of Penelope’s father as well as the dissatisfaction of Sophie, Julian’s mother, Zafon actually "drops the bomb" at the end of a chapter: Julian and Penelope may be lovers, but they’re also brother and sister!  The impact just wasn’t there for me since I’d guessed it a hundred pages prior.  There was also another "bomb" that got diffused.  At the end of the first person pov narrative by Daniel, he claims that within a week he’d be dead.  After an inset and change of pov to a a first person of another character where a lot of backstory is given, we are returned to Daniel’s story and find that he had officially stopped breathing for sixty seconds.  My guess was more dramatic:  he officially lost his personality as Daniel and became Julian.  This is another area where Zafon should leave some questions up to the readers.

Then there’s the fact that Zafon handles this information rather strangely.  While it tells us why Penelope’s father was so infuriated when he finds out who got her pregnant, it would also make sense for Julian’s friends to give him this information at some point in the twenty years after she dies in childbirth rather than have him blame himself for her death when they finally tell him she’s dead.

There are some character descriptions that are not changes as a result of the situations, but rather what I almost see as a slip-up by Zafon.  Nuria describes Julian’s later behavior as nasty, yet caring about Daniel.  The evil Fumero was madly in love with Penelope and his hate for Julian and his friends drives his actions, yet he refers once to Penelope as a "tart." 

Some questions about technical information also arise.  Daniel goes to the mansion and sees the coffins, and yet Nuria’s message to Daniel claims that Julian has moved the coffins.  There were many of these that had me flipping through pages backward to check out details.

So while I enjoyed the novel enough to overlook the millions of street names and most of the huh? moments, I’m still left with some burning question: How did Daniel find that one hidden book in the library? Why did he love the book when none of Julian’s novels sold well? And the hottest of all: Why did Julian burn his books?

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | 2 Comments