LITERATURE: Glimmer Train #55 – Finale

Well I read The Open Door; I wish that anyone who’s read this and liked it will be kind enough to comment here.  The voice was terrific in the old storytelling way.  And supposedly we’re left wondering about the open door and a couple of things missing from the cabin.  But de Looze goes way back into the death of the man’s wife, the spreading of her ashes on the lake, throws in a couple of interesting local characters, goes on about fishing vs. hunting, and ends the story in a way that appears to be an attempt at being mystical.  So much for that.

For me, the stars of this issue were All of Me (Krouse), Footsteps(Chen), Sightseeing (Lapcharoensap),  and The Last Time I Saw Him (Wallace) for elements of story, character, imagery–and most importantly, new technique.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Glimmer Train #55 – Finale

LITERATURE: Glimmer Train #55 – Rambling

This final story, The Open Door by Laurence deLooze is an example of something that’s been bothering me lately in many instances of currently published contemporary short fiction; it often rambles on and on, flaunting all the rules of making every word count:

In a single thought, Bill wondered if Dunger was all right, and also realized that he had absolutely no idea how long the door had stood open.  He had no way to measure the open door against time.  Against sequentiality.  Maybe Dunger had been by numerous times, but the door had still been closed?  All he had to go by was his arrival.  How long, in fact, had the door been open before Bill arrived?  Was it a matter of days or of weeks?  Had the door somehow clicked open only minutes before he drove up—as though by some mysterious, impossible remote control?  Even as Bill tried to work logically through the possibilities, the lack of logic inherent in the puzzle itself defeated him again and again.  (p. 119)

Now this may be building up as a mystery story, but this paragraph is four pages into the story, long after he’s come up to his cabin to find the door open, and he’s been wondering about it since.  To me, the questions the author has the protagonist asking himself is what the reader is asking; so are we being asked to not think about it because the character is doing it all for us?

de Looze then goes into the background of the character, from his early geek/hippie days through his marriage and career.  Backstory all; told as if he were preparing a bio.

I almost put this down since it’s the last story to read in this issue, but flipping pages caught my eye that maybe this story is going somewhere, so I’ll continue on.  I’m also wondering if it’s not my current frame of mind; cramming everything that needs to be done into not enough hours but impatiently insistent.  Lord knows, I’m not one that requires any shouting action in the first few pages–nor even in the whole story.  I’ll give Mr. deLooze the benefit of the doubt.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | 1 Comment

REALITY?: Just What is This World Coming To?

Neat day today, although I’ll still be in the frameshop catching up.  But there are some literary I-gotta-do’s that will be pushed in between here too. 

Got a red eyeball; suitable for scaring small children.  I don’t remember getting something in my eye, so likely I poked it with a fingernail in my sleep.  It looks wonderfully horrid.

Read that the Pope has reiterated the existence of Hell.  Now see, here’s where I fell off the Catholic wagon to begin with; this and divorce.  My rational mind tells me that there’s no one–absolutely no one–living or dead that I would condemn to eternal fire.  I just don’t think everybody’s had the same fair breaks in life.  I’ve said this before: If Adolph Hitler had been brought up by my folks, he just would never have done what he did.  And here’s where I lose a lotta folks:  If an innocent newborn dies and is baptized, he goes straight to Heaven; do not pass trials and tribulations–go directly to Heaven, like in Monopoly.  Not sure that’s fair either (forget for a moment the horrible tragedy of it all and focus on the end result–if you’re a good Christian, that’s the best thing you could wish for your child).   So, it follows that if I can’t find candidates for Hell, and I’m not the most forgiving person in world, then God, in all His goodness and love couldn’t possibly do it either.

But I could be wrong.

Posted in REALITY | 5 Comments

LITERATURE: Glimmer Train #55 – Some Not So Great

This particular issue had a majority of good to excellent stories, well written, innovative and interesting.  But there were a couple not so great.

Men in Brown by Joan Connor is about a woman’s fantasies about her UPS man, and she gets to date him.  My first honest gut reaction?  YA.  To me, particularly after reading some real winning stories, this story seemed to be both for a fifteen year-old and written by one.  I’ve been through creative writing classes and this just rang back memories. 

Okay?  Okay?  Why doesn’t he go away and take that black licorice whip of hair with him?  But I am a sucker for sweets.  An all-day sucker, a sucker for succor.  "Fine," I say.  "Everything’s fine."  My voice sounds as thin as a spaghetti strap slipping from a shoulder.  (p. 198)

The story is loaded with food simile, too loaded.  The alliteration here is more pronounced than in other sections, but the cholately chocolate, browner than brown, three or four phrases spent to emphasize a statement sounds flippantly comic instead of the author taking the time to edit, and find the single best way to say something. Maybe the voice is consistent and strong, but for me it was obnoxiously annoying.  O’Connor, by the way, is weighty with credentials as prizewinner and teacher, so maybe it’s me.

Bartleby, by Anthony Farrington, is yet another divorced father with two small children trying to restart his life in a new neighborhood.  It involves a strange little boy next door, the boy’s stranger father, and even stranger yet, the boy’s mother who insists that the newcomers feed a dog that we’re not sure is real.  And bugs; lotsa bugs.  It was good writing, but the story just kind of was there without making any real impact.

There is one yet that I haven’t read.  It’s quite long and I will, tonight or tomorrow, go over it.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Glimmer Train #55 – Some Not So Great

LITERATURE: Glimmer Train #55 – Two Good’uns

Both of these struck me not only for their story, but for noticeable fine technique.  Which, yeah, you’re not supposed to notice but as a writer–and I’m sure Francine Prose would agree–you do indeed notice and if you can, admire.

First up, Daniel Wallace’s The Last Time I Saw Him.  First person narrator, a son reminiscing about his father. 

Every now and then, between scenarios that move around in time and space (I’d have to go back and check if there is a backward or forward theme) there is a paragraph that begins with the title theme:

The last time I saw him he was in town for something, a business thing, and he had a little time before a meeting and said maybe we could meet in the hotel bar, have a drink, talk. (p. 89)

This reminds me a lot of a story I read back in a Contemporary Fiction class; I’m bringing this information with me:  The father has been derelict in his relationship with his son, and there is this trying too hard that accompanies his realization.  There’s still, however, the lack of knowing what to do beyond duty.

The last time I saw him was on a Christmas afternoon.  My mother and I had opened our presents that morning, and cleaned up, and then she’d gone over to her boyfriend’s house. p. 92)

So our suspicions were correct.  The narrator is the product of a broken home.  The scenes also end with this enigmatic idea:

(…) and I went to sleep, and he left on his trip, and after that I never saw him again in my entire life.  (p. 96)

Beautifully done.  We’re getting the backstory served up as courses in a fine meal.  And the obvious yet mysterious:  Last time I saw him?  Is it merely the thought that was his at the time, or something more…something like seeing his father in different ways each time, so that truly, it was the last.  Excellent technique, excellent writing.

The next is a short story by Angela Pneuman called The Bell Ringer.  Third person omniscient, getting into the heads of two sisters and the husband of one of them.  One of the sisters is mentally disturbed, and here we see great insight into a jumbled mind trying to hold on to normalcy.  Her sister’s problems are seen through art classes she is taking, and the sister’s husband is having some minor crisises of his own.  All well presented in the interaction of the characters. Classic showing.

There was only one part that I would almost consider a missed opportunity to shine.  In the beginning, the mentally disturbed sister goes to stay with her married sister who has a six-year old daughter.  The daughter sleeps with her aunt, and notices:

Aunt Esther sleeps wearing a yellow smiley-face T-shirt and black bikini panties.  One morning Amy wakes before Aunt Esther and counts eleven purple and red lines the length of her little finger, one laid above the next like a train track climbing the white skin up out of the black panties.  (p. 165)

Well placed exposition; we know up to this point that Aunt Esther (who is 24) had been living down in Florida with a couple men.  We can only suspect what went on, as Amy sees the scars on her aunt’s back.  Unfortunately, Pneuman brings it up again too soon; without answering the question, she has everyone else in the house wondering about it along with us.  I felt it was too prominently referred to in the story and that wasn’t necessary; believe me, I hadn’t forgotten about it.  But the story is a good one, well defined characters and realistic imagery.  Nicely done. 

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Glimmer Train #55 – Two Good’uns

REALITY?: Sally Passing By

I hear my name called out.  It trails as if it were driving by without the gravel-sound of the cars that go to work, come home, or maybe just take joyrides on a warm new spring day.

But there’s the flash of white and thump-thumping sounds of running shoes and I look up to see a bright red ponytail swinging by.

Life is what you make it, what you expect and what you let go of because you think you’ll never need it anymore.  Toddling out of infancy, racing through adolescence, stumbling even as we climb until we learn we can still move just by shuffling.

I smile to see Sally running by.

Posted in REALITY | 3 Comments

LITERATURE: When the Going Gets Tough…

032707l

VS.   032707l2

A comment below my post on my intention to skim through the rest of At Swim-Two-Birds has brought me up short.

Here I was, railing against libraries that refuse free classics as inventory, and students who think skating is done in the classroom, and I was throwing in the towel when I got to some difficult reading.

I am properly chastised and repentant.  I shall continue my journey through O’Brien’s labyrinth.  Perhaps even my mind in its current state is more willing and able to care enough about literature and comprehending it than those who are younger and prefer picture books without depth.

Posted in LITERATURE | Comments Off on LITERATURE: When the Going Gets Tough…

LITERATURE: Change of Face

I forgot where I’d picked up the link this morning, but this article in The Evening Standard (U.K.) News just about did me in.  Evidently school libraries are refusing gifts of classic literature because "today’s pupils find them too ‘difficult’ to read." 

Instead, they want Japanese comic books (which will be read, cover to cover, and that’s good, isn’t it?) which are the students’ favorites.  The classics are too boring and not only in text; seems that "The paper jackets are ugly and unattractive and the binding is dull and boring."

In the meantime, "a new CBI report revealed that many business leaders are complaining that school leavers are lacking in basic literacy, numeracy and other ’employability’ skills."

Not everyone is agreeing of this discarding of the classics from the libraries, some are outraged, thank God.  But the whole thing is so typical of today’s way of dealing with problems; you got dumb kids?  It’s because the work’s too hard.  Make it easier for them and they’ll be able to succeed.

At what?  Being mediocre?

My reading rounds this morning brought out the above on the heels of that much overused and abused "society’s to blame" cliche which was the cry of the ’70s and for some reason still works today.  For Pete’s sake; everything in society happens because of society–good and bad.  It’s certainly a truism; but it’s about as vague as you can get for getting to the source of anything.

I’m sure we could come up with something more contemporary and drop the old "society" bit.  How about Bush?  We could always blame Bush; at least until another easy target comes along.

Posted in LITERATURE | 3 Comments

REALITY?: Work Ethic

Here it is, Sunday afternoon, and I’m working in the shop.  I promised two customers that they can come in on Monday and Tuesday to pick up–two days that I’m closed–because customer service requires compromise.  The two orders are a total of 17 pieces.  I’m not going to make much money because I’m bad on charging enough for my work.

But the customer is always right.

Speaking of work ethic, here’s a post that hints at change that reveals itself in its early stages.

Posted in REALITY | Comments Off on REALITY?: Work Ethic

LITERATURE: The Pleasure of the Text – Updated

A thought:  In Barthes’ likening reading to an orgasmic sensation, in his cajoling the reader to seek more from text, I wonder what his thoughts would be on the involvement of all the senses required by new media methods of presentation?

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: The Pleasure of the Text – Updated

LITERATURE: The Pleasure of the Text – Maybe…

Slowly working my way through this, reading every word but not quite understanding it.  But long ago I realized that this is going to have to be read many times to get the benefit of Barthes’ words. 

They’re not bliss reading-wise, that’s for sure; yet that is exactly what he is trying to impart.  And I may be wrong, but I’m not taking his considerations as to reading style for just the classic literary books.  Personally, I would try to apply what he says to every word that’s written.  Yes, to a scientist, a formula can be utterly joyful in its revelation.  To please the reader is the goal, and what I’m looking for in this book is to seek that state of elevation of mind no matter the subject; it’s whatever turns you on. For Barthes’ is not considering the writer; the writer–for him–is dead.

In alleging that the same text does not bring pleasure to the same reader consistently, in taking into consideration it’s "surprise" value–which is something I can understand; that phrase that makes you stop below a mental Wow–there is also of course the proof that in re-readings, we find something that we merely read before. 

And sometimes even Barthes can prove the point:

The text is (should be) that uninhibited person who shows his behind to the Political Father. (p. 53)

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: The Pleasure of the Text – Maybe…

WRITING: Groups

Just as I was beginning to miss the writers group, I realized why I pulled out:  a note from a member who put me on a mailing list for donations to a favorite charity.  No "hey, you been writing at all?" or "you know, I’ve been working on something I’d like to have the group go over…" 

There’ve been only a couple members who have been in touch and who have brought  up the possibility of a meeting again.  It’s difficult to keep a group together unless there’s some real passion.  You don’t need a huge gathering of like minds, and certainly with the arts, there’s a wide range of interest within each individual member as the mood swings with the inspiration. 

But jeez; to be contacted only for a donation?

Posted in WRITING | Comments Off on WRITING: Groups

REALITY?: Adventure

I’m making dinner, computing, and watching Conan the Barbarian on TV.  A village is getting slaughtered while a buncha people sing in the background.  With just about all the villagers dead, one lady and a kid face down the bad guys.  They didn’t even bother hiding.  Oooh–it’s Darth Vader, the leader of the bad guys.  He just cut off the lady’s head while her kid watched.  Neat.

Posted in REALITY | 1 Comment

LITERATURE: Shop At Home Binge

Okay, so the sun is shining, the birds are singing, early dawn saw clouds running across the morning sky and an e-mail check showed another overstock.com sale.

Sixteen more books due in, at a cost of $3.12 each including shipping.  But I’m going to have one of the best classic lit libraries in town. 

It used to be shoes; I have boxes and boxes of shoes including two pair of purple, two of apple green, and a couple real woolen ones–one plaid, one herringbone–all bought on sale when sales were $5/pair (and for size 4-1/2, there were plenty to choose from).  I even checked out the clogs before I pressed the submit order button on the site.  Couldn’t help myself; just had to look.  And there’s a lovely sapphire ring I’ve been drooling over for many months, but Willie’s concert and the need to read have overcome.

And thanks to my sister, there’s no longer any use trying to save to build that home addition.

Posted in LITERATURE | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Shop At Home Binge

LITERATURE: At Swim-Two-Birds – Skimming

Yes, I’m at that point.  Halfway through and it’s gotten to me.  While I’m awed by the skill and intrigued by the methods, I’m just not into the story(ies) enough to deep-read this one right now. 

It’s a personal thing; my mind has been taken up by other things that claim the good part of me that seeks the enjoyment of reading and writing and life in general.  Until one of the bigger weights is off my head, it’s still difficult to concentrate on things that deserve the attention but are not vital time-wise to expend on them.  I’m amazed at this book, and hate to leave it–right now I see it as a guide to writing, and in particular, writing hypertext fiction.  O’Brien almost lays it right out as a pattern for consideration.  He tells us what’s going on with multi-layers and characters taking over story and going their own way once birthed.  He has them fighting their creator, the author.  It’s great stuff.

But it’s wasted on one such as me.  I’m going to skim the rest, just to see if I can pick it up further into the story without getting bogged down with the language and escapades that don’t appear to present plot as much as entertainment and interest.

May the Great God of Literature forgive me.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | 2 Comments