WRITING: Creative Flow

Remember how "eloquently" I posted that bit about creativity returning via "swallowing the muse?" 

Well, follow the metaphor out to its inevitable conclusion and you’ll see where I stand creatively the last few days. 

I think the idea of trying to meet deadline was what forced some effort.  Now, with that deadline unsuccessfully past, I’m back to my old procrastinating self.  Heck, I’ve got six months to go before another otto issue is due.  I miss the strict deadlines of my college days.  I’d obviously make a horrendous teacher because I’m a pushover for extensions both to others as well as myself.  Mañana is my mantra.

Posted in WRITING | 1 Comment

LITERATURE: Ploughshares

BTW, I’m actually an issue prior to the one I noted previously, since I found the earlier one unread and am weird about keeping things chronologically organized in my catching up of the lit journals.

One of the stories in the issue of Ploughshares that I’m reading is about a gay man who happens to have troubles with his mother and his lover, and he’s discovered paid spanking.  We don’t really find out why he suddenly comes upon this need, and I’m taking his explanation that he needs to "feel something" as emotional solitude learned as protective barrier from a mother who didn’t really react to his announcement of sexual preference, and a pretty-boy lover who we’re shown often is more involved in what’s on tv than in couple interaction.  (This story is from a well-published author, not a newbie; most of the writers in this issue have quite good publishing credentials.)  And the ending is a letdown. 

We really haven’t a feel for the character, and the only saving grace to me was in just having read Marquez’s 100 Years of Solitude to help understand the character’s motive, but Marquez wove a book around this human reaction to life.  A short story without real resolution doesn’t cut it.  This character is forced to dump his mother in a nursing home when she develops Alzheimers.  He goes through his mother’s house and things, but no real sensitivity or recall is given that would add depth and value to his character.  He cries for twenty minutes in a men’s room stall of the nursing facility as he leaves his mother behind and so I would think he’s feeling normal emotion, and maybe we can even stretch our understanding to cover their relationship and her muddle-minded acceptance of his gayness, but there never really was any conflict revealed anyway.  Then he dumps his lover because he hasn’t noticed the welts on his ass and he happily continues his relationship with his sadistic liaison.  That’s resolution?

I’m getting the feeling that contemporary literature is sort of the first-year CW student tendency posted prior, and that some of the the lit journals perpetuate the misconception of value by introducing new words or concepts for mere shock value, testing the controversial limits of good taste just as each new television season is flooded with the latest word to slide by the censors.  Last year it was "ass."  I’m afraid I haven’t watched enough tv in the past month to note the latest addition.  The above story discussed includes gay sex, Alzheimers, sadomasochism and Disneyland.  Yet it still doesn’t seem to have a story.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Ploughshares

WRITING: Expletives (Should be) Deleted

Honestly, I don’t think that anything screams first semester creative writing class louder in a short story or poem than having fuck sprinkled liberally throughout for no damn good reason.  It is as if the college level course liberates and validates the spirit to type those four little letters, or expand it to six with fuckin just as we all once practiced the word with our friends back in the eighth grade. 

The next dead giveaway of an amateur is the expression of violence or rage that gives voice to our repressed realities.  If you want to be a good writer, better you should strangle your sister and get it over with to move on in writing by learning true character development and expression of emotion.

I think the instruction to be free creatively, to be dramatic and explore conflicts of impact is too often misconstrued by the new writer.  Climax in story does not mean a successful fuck.  Drama does not mean blood and guns.  Nor, in the more puritanical sense, does conflict and resolution mean making the blind see again.  Leave that to Jesus.  He’s a tough act to follow so come up with something different than the short stories that are already covered in the Bible.

While language should certainly be suited to the voice of the character, and I certainly love some of these words myself, in writing, less is more.  Less is more.  Less is more.

Posted in WRITING | Comments Off on WRITING: Expletives (Should be) Deleted

LITERATURE: A Different Reading

I’m plowing through Ploughshares, but it’s just not the same.  It’s strange to read without stopping with an audible Ahhhh.  Although the writing is fine, and the stories are interesting, nothing yet so awesome as to click somewhere with style or skill or metaphorical grace. 

In the meantime, I’m awaiting the printer’s call to alert me that otto #2 is ready to pickup, put together and distribute.  Although I’m a bit disappointed that we didn’t get to include the graphic story in this issue, nor did I come through with my experiment on hypertext within the printed pages, it is still a lit journal that’s full of great story and poetry.  And, what we didn’t manage to get done in time for this issue is hopefully committed for the next. 

Two of our blog buddies are included in this issue, and more info on them and the availability of otto #2 will be posted this week.

And so, to bed…

Posted in LITERATURE | 1 Comment

LITERATURE: Discussions

Well here ya go, my complaints of the lack of comments and discussions here at Spinning answered; a book club right at our local library that meets Tuesday mornings and/or evenings to discuss a selected book.  Up for review:  Oswald Wynd’s The Ginger Tree, James McBride’s The Color of Water, Jonathan Lethem’s Motherless Brooklyn, and John Steinbeck’s Cannery Row

Off the top of my head, as well as giving myself time to read one, I’m leaning towards Steinbeck. I’ve read Grapes of Wrath, and may even have read Cannery Row but it would have been a long time ago.  It’s the focus of an evening group, and is scheduled for the week after Christmas so while I may wander into an earlier meeting in the next two weeks, I think I won’t partake in the discussion and the necessary reading until I pick up Cannery Row.

Sometimes the old fashioned real people way is best.

Posted in LITERATURE | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Discussions

BLOGGING: Space & Place

In checking in on comments and stats, I’ve found only a very limited number of readers interested in my reading reviews, and those few are not interested in the personal nor the writing exercises.  Am I needy?  A whiner?  Probably.  But the fact that only one person bothered to click on my project link in a prior post tells me something.  And the fact that this problem seems to come up on a regular basis with me demands decision–not mere repetition of, okay, I’ll keep plodding along ’cause two people said I should.

What to do?

Well, I’m not going to close shop with a year paid in advance, but I believe some rethinking of my weblogs is called for, and while I’ll start planning for it now, it probably won’t be done until the first of next year.  My big plans to be considered a literary weblog flopped, and even with the emphasis on literary analysis, somehow I’ve not been selected as an official literary site although many I see that are include more personal entries, or are mere "link-on-logs" which point to the biggies.

On the other hand, I’m no longer interested in blogging my daily routine nor my personal ups and downs exclusively.  These things inevitably creep in, as I am basically honest and open–at least written word-wise–but I’ve tried to keep them to a minimum or include if they relate to what I’m reading or doing in literature, or, when they just can’t be stoppered up, present them metaphorically. 

While it has often been pointed out that we writers are supposed to write for ourselves, this is pure hogwash.  Everyone needs to be appreciated.  We’re not 16-year old diary keepers; we’re writers and we need an audience.  Is an actor, dancer, singer content spending his talent in front of a mirror?  If we wrote merely for our own self-satisfaction or need, we can more easily write straight into Windows Word and the heck with sharing or hoping for acknowledgement.  Weblogs do, however, seem to provide a certain discipline of meeting false deadlines by their nature of being dated and read–or at least, scanned.  But a weblog can also be unpublished and private, so that only wandering Googlers ever, to their disgust when they’re trying to do research or find porn, mistakenly plop into someone’s weblog world.

So the paths diverge.  Maybe a less down-home and more professional literary analysis will be one track, and another non-fiction creative writing.  In the meantime, I’ll do my best to keep up with the road I’m on and not take lack of interest personally.  We all have something to say, and I need to realize that with the explosion of good writing seen in a growing weblog community, we just can’t take the time to read them all but instead have the glorious option of selecting those of particular interest or quality.  I think that one of the best elements of a weblog is the ability to comment, and I long ago gave up the fear of it seeming too much like leaving a calling card and comment often as a means of showing support, opinion, encouragement or appreciation.  The field is constantly changing, and with it, so too shall I.

Posted in BLOGGING | 3 Comments

LITERATURE: On the Table

Although I want so badly I can taste the urge to pick back up McCarthy, I am holding off to explore some new horizons.

Novel:  The Body Artist by Don DeLillo.  I have no idea where or when I picked this up, and I apologize if he was indeed a speaker at Wesleyan or at our own Tunxis Conference and my muddled mind has lost that fact.  I chose it because, well, because it’s short.

Short Story:  Ploughshares, Winter oh-four/05.  This as an attempt to play catchup, and rekindle my burning desire to be published in it someday.

Learning:  Didascalicon by Hugh of St. Victor.  I’ve put it back too many times already.  Although if I can’t absorb it fully right now, I may try a lighter book on reading or writing.

New Media:  Still Life.  I’m so anxious to get into this, although I may return to Silent Hill 2 just because it’s more an outlet for my repressed rage and potential violent behavior.  Love swingin’ that stick!

Okay, so four not five.  But it’s a helluva lot better than my recent Book of the Month odyssey. 

Posted in LITERATURE | Comments Off on LITERATURE: On the Table

LITERATURE: 100 Years – Some Final Thoughts

I feel as if I am letting myself down in not producing an overall picture of this novel.  It has been with me (more so than I with it) for a month or more, and one that I had delved deeply into.  The ending was so dramatic, so skillfully built in arc that I would almost draw a curve that  rose and rose and didn’t fall gradually but smashed instead and dropped in an explosion onto page four hundred forty-eight. 

Concurrently with this reading, my reality has been in varied states of conflict, and so the story of this solitude was fully realized by one who saw it not as jail or coffin, but a holding room I’d thought I had abandoned.  This coloring of the meaning is a selfish taking of the text to heart instead of clearminded analysis of story, and to pretend otherwise would be difficult if not distorted. 

One thing that I would note is that with the use of surrealism, Marquez has exorcised the horror of situations that are more graphic than McCarthy’s Blood Meridian in detail.  Yet, if we come to accept the unreality as part of the whole, it becomes acceptable, near emotionless in response.  Perhaps, we become encased in a protective solitude of our own. After all, we didn’t cringe in reading of the wicked stepmother as she pinched the chubby cheeks of Hansel and Gretel in preparing them for dinner. 

Barthes would be proud of my involvement.  But sharing what is just personal reflection is not of any value.  So I leave it now, close the book and move along.  I know I’ll pick it up again in better days.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | 1 Comment

REALITY: Subscriptions

An offer came today, a free subscription to New England Home.  A few years back I read magazines like this religiously, poring over the ideas in decorating, planning the addition of a family room, new kitchen, second bath, laundry room and larger master bedroom.  So close within our grasp I had the Spanish tiles picked out, the room layout in a design that builders could not build from as a blueprint, but clear in my own mind as far as where the couches sat.  All up in smoke with a series of sad events, and now, no longer even allowed as a dream.  I cannot even leaf through the book without a twinge of want.

Prior to these there’d been decades of Vogue, Good Housekeeping, Cosmopolitan.  All gone with time that changes me as well as the content of their pages.

Now, I stay with Writer’s Digest.  And Readers Digest for the bathroom bookstand.  That was tradition in our home.  The endurance of need over want.

Posted in REALITY | Comments Off on REALITY: Subscriptions

LITERATURE: 100 Years – Resolutions

I need more time to come to grips with the powerful ending, fable-like and maybe moralistic, and as a point, must have had those of you who’ve read the book tittering with the "I know something you don’t" smugness at my feeble efforts to assign meanings that were so far off from what Marquez states so clearly in the end. 

"…because races condemned to one hundred years of solitude did not have a second opportunity on earth."  (p. four-forty-eight)

Aureliano Babilonia and his aunt (although they are unaware of this particular connection) Amaranta Ursula are the last of their line, tied together by a lust that becomes a love.  She is carrying his child, and when their son is born, he is marked with the "tail of a pig" that Ursula always worried about with the incestuous relationships that were sprinkled throughout the history, as well as the offspring born of whores and lovers.  I remember even as a child being warned by nuns about anothing as close or closer than first-cousin matings.  There was even one married first-cousin couple within our church who’d suffered the heartbreak of their son confined to a wheelchair and his death before he hit the age of eighteen.  And their daughter, who was most likely perfectly normal but suffered whispers of her oddly round large head. 

All friends are gone, all Buendias dead, (SPOILER:  including Amaranta Ursula in childbirth, and the newborn babe, carried off by ants as Aureliano roars his loss of his beloved Amaranta and forgets the baby back at home) and the parchments of Melquiades, as suspected, are in truth the history, past through future of the Buendias and Macondo.  They forecast and are destroyed along with Aureliano just as he finds he can decipher them. 

And I see love, the caring and touching of each other and mankind, the key to breaking the solitude they each have self-imposed and constructed carefully around themselves.   Aureliano discovers it too late:

"Aureliano did not understand until then how much he loved his friends, how much he missed them, and how much he would have given to be with them at that moment. He put the child in the basket that his mother had prepared for him, covered the face of the corpse (Amaranta) with a blanket, and wandered aimlessly through the town, searching for an entrance that went back to the past."  (p. four-forty-three)

With most of the town abandoned, his old haunts and acquaintances gone, he commiserates with a bartender:

"The bartender spoke to him about the misfortune of his arm.  Aureliano spoke to him about the misfortune of his heart, withered and somewhat crumpled for having been raised against his sister.  They ended up weeping together and Aureliano felt for a moment that the pain was over.  But when he was alone again in the last dawn of Macondo, he opened up his arms in the middle of the square, ready to wake up the whole world, and he shouted with all his might:

‘Friends are a bunch of bastards!’ "  (p. four-forty-four)

There are reasons that we read and must often go back:  Did we catch that "he was alone again in the last dawn of Macondo?"  We do find that it is indeed the end, as foretold by Melquides and exactly as Aureliano reads of it. 

But why is Aureliano not a saving grace because of his ability to love and understand?  I would have expected that, a turn-around of history.  This then smacks of destiny, even to the tune of a given amount of time–one hundred years–and while he, the end of his line, must bear the suffering in the knowing and the loving, he is too late, his fate is sealed.  And, I realize that while I have integrated the story into my own thoughts of death and any sort of afterlife, Marquez has dashed my hopes of complicity in his final words:  "…because races condemned to one hundred years of solitude did not have a second opportunity on earth."

Even as Aureliano, free of his solitude of soul remains the solitary Buendia left to understand and read the history of his family–and here, a strange surrealistic note that while it may be linearly written, (i.e., "he skipped again to anticipate the predictions and ascertain the date and circumstances of his death." ), Marquez also notes that it "was based on the fact that Melquiades had not put events in the order of man’s conventional time, but had concentrated a century of daily episodes in such a way that they coexisted in one instant."

Goodness, a touch of Jorge Borges’ Garden of Forking Paths here. 

As the winds threaten, as Aureliano reads, anxious to get to that final part, the end of him, the end comes as foretold.  There is a play of time warp that Marquez uses.  His great-great grandmothers, Ursula and the mistress Pilar, have reached ages well beyond normal range by nearly double.  These two are the threads that weave the men, the children together through the century.  Yet even they are alone in their own solitudes, their love still not enough, or of the right kind, to save the generations and their lives. 

Nor evidently, their souls except as ghosts allowed to walk the rooms in helplessness to overturn that which was written and would come to be.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: 100 Years – Resolutions

REALITY: Dreamin’

Wow.  Was out in the shop before it got light out, decided after a bit that I wouldn’t last the day.  Went back in for a brief nap if possible.

Wow.  Woke a few minutes ago, stumbled back out here clinging to a hot cup of coffee.  And remembering the last part of a dream.  Huge party somewhere.  Loads of people.  Nancy’s I think.  She let me put the strung beef I found in our car from last week into her freezer.  My niece acting cool, mad-at-me-cool.  I asked her if it was because of her mom and me and the house.  No, worse.

She’s in a mess because that candy I told her to sell made everybody sick, some people died, some are just mad at her for trying to make them buy it.  Like back in grade school with the nuns.  I don’t remember.  What candy?  I ask.  She says I know damn well it’s the candy I sold her.  Huh?  She says it’s tied to a bogus church group and shows me a letter with letterhead sparkled with stars and gold flowers.  Meyers First Church of Reunion I read.  I still don’t know what she’s talking about, but I tell her she should have told me right away, that I don’t understand but I’ll do what I can to help her.  We walk up the street, I turn and go back.  The gravel is hard without shoes.

A good lot of my dreams are of these huge rambling houses filled with people.  And there is usually someone I know well who holds a problem past or current out to me on a metaphorical platter.  I think that is why in my waking time I avoid parties and crowds.

Posted in REALITY | Comments Off on REALITY: Dreamin’

LITERATURE: 100 Years – Finale

I liked it.  It was a good book. 

This two or three hours’ sleep sucks big time.  Yes, I have finished 100 Years, but I need go back because the pace picked up, the thirst for closure overtook my patient analytical ways.  Some great stuff that needs to be separated out and studied, though history, decay and human love is foremost in the theme, as is, of course, that certain solitude we each may seek and produce for ourselves.  And that’s what I cannot as easily decide–the theme, the story as a whole instead of broken down in pieces as I’ve done for the past month.  There is so much to learn, so much to turn around and twist and pull and settle back in place.  Even this, a Marquez poke at literature and education:

"In the lethargy of her pregnancy, Amaranta Ursula tried to set up a business in necklaces made out of the backbones of fish.  But except for Mercedes, who bought a dozen, she could not  find any customers.  Aureliano was aware for the first time that his gift for languages, his encyclopedic knowledge, his rare faculty for remembering the details of remote deeds and places without having been there, were as useless as the box of genuine jewelry that his wife owned, which must have been worth as much as all the money that the last inhabitants of Macondo could have put together." (p. four-thirty-eight)

For me, the backbones of fish call back the beginning of the journey, Jose Arcadio Buendia’s trek to find the sea.  The skeleton of fish reveals the loss of not only flesh (the dead) but water.  The backbone, the spine, the structure that not only holds all together in life, but remains beyond death.  Macondo?  The spirit of Buendia?  The past, picked clean by the generations of the living?

And, Aureliano’s years of study of language to enable him to read the parchments of Melquiades become as useless as the box of genuine jewelry his wife owned.  Is the knowledge gained useless unless shared, discussed and argued, maybe proven, as Aureliano used it briefly among the bookseller and his friends?  Genuine jewelry would lead me to believe it does indeed have value, and yet it’s lost without either the growing of it, or if it represents the future, or the world outside of Macondo, does it remain although Macondo turns to dereliction and dust?

There’s more, much more that I must sort through; reading and deciphering the pages as if they were the writings of Melquiades.

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: 100 Years – Finale

LITERATURE: Endings

Just my usual trails of thinking in the dark hours of early morning.  This time, on written book form versus interactive fiction, including games such as Silent Hill or Half Life 2 that can well be considered story. 

The key word I’m hanging on is destiny.  Printed text has long ago experimented with the open ending; sometimes offering other solutions (Atwoods’s short story Happy Endings) or leaving us hanging (inviting sequels, Harry Potter being the latest assurance of future income). While the thought behind interactivity is the idea of reader input that occurs naturally but enhancing it by giving it a more physical capability, there is still the predetermined outcome–or outcomes in some of the more sophisticated works–where any variations and paths still must end.  I’m wondering if even in the reading/playing/clicking well-thought-out or exploratory, there comes a time when the frustration of a little power overcomes the joy of cutting one’s own swaths since the resolution is the resolution anyway. 

It is human nature to decide one’s boundaries.  Some of us are domesticable to the point of staying well within the corral, even to the point of visual knowledge, as a dog trained to white flags that parallel the buried wires of an electric fence that will buzz and zap.  Some of us walk through our days with shoes prepared for climbing.  Will the little bit of control that we’ve been given through the effects of new media preparations only serve to whet our appetites for pushing out the boundaries further and further until we read the only possible end–that is, a return to reality itself?  Wasn’t this in fact the premise of Dungeons and DragonsMurder on the Connecticut River?

Posted in LITERATURE | Tagged | Comments Off on LITERATURE: Endings

POETRY: Of Broken Men

Ah men, I want to spread
my arms and take them in to drown their fear,
to love them with a whore’s heart
in the taking, not unwanted giving—
only more they cannot carry through the night.

Their tears cut deeper wounds
of knowing, yet like all else, they do not know
where the bandages are kept,
and sweep the floors with wind gust from
a Boeing forty-seven and bury dinner plates.

Bleeding, weeping purple gashes mark
their unhealing souls, yet lips are stitched shut as if
by Cupid’s arrow turned sewing needle wielded by
a witch’s hand. I want to shelter them inside
a cave wet, warm and temporary.

They speak in a strange sign
language of their own, their arms held tightly at
their sides like saplings planted, rooted in
a ground as firm as waters of the sea and still
they won’t put rubbers on.

But reach out blindly for an anchor
heavy as a dream, a wisp of painted memory to warm
them, warn them, wrap them in wombs made
of smoke, and kneel on sodden sheets in adoration
of their holy lost madonnas.

Posted in POETRY | 1 Comment

WRITING: Time

The more line I lay out, the more tightly I grip the roll of string that flies the kite of past.  It shrinks within the blank blue sky, hits a cloud and flies above it, changed somehow.  Tiny, tiny; but there.  Fingers numbed by nerves that’ve given up their sensitivity, so tighten on the hold as if the numbness threatens the connection though the tail waves wildly in the wind. 

But still I feel the ball roll in my hand, the pull of present letting out the string. 

Posted in WRITING | Comments Off on WRITING: Time